Search for: "People v. Cole" Results 101 - 120 of 408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2018, 1:59 pm by Hannah Kris
Sixteen people were killed in the assault, and 40 were hospitalized. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
” Both cases involve lawsuits by victims of the terrorist bombing of the USS Cole against the Republic of Sudan as a state sponsor of terrorism. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:30 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Personal saving and investment are necessary for long-term economic growth. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:46 am by Scott Bomboy
The 2013 policy change, known as the Cole memo, focused federal attorneys on pursuing cases against people who sold marijuana to minors, took part in interstate trafficking, were members of criminal gangs, or used federal property for marijuana purposes. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm by Matthew Scott Johnson
Is cited in the following article: Cole Antolak, Airport Security: Over-Reaching New Heights, 18 Pitt. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:52 am by SHG
And that’s the message sent by the majority in its per curiam opinion in Kisela v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am by Colby Pastre
Key Findings In December 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), arguably the most significant piece of tax legislation in three decades. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Today’s second argument is in Ohio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm by William Ford
Al-Nashiri is accused of planning the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:25 am by Tammy Binford
He also points out that under the California Supreme Court case Ross v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am by Robichaud
  Text Message Privacy: Where We Are and Where We Are GoingGerald Chan (Stockwoods LLP) Introduction             It’s no exaggeration to say that many people, especially young people, now prefer texting to talking on the phone. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
., married-student housing at a religious college) would better be viewed not as implicating compelled speech, but instead, as David Cole suggested at argument, as raising the question whether the Court would, or might, craft additional exceptions to the general free exercise doctrine of Employment Division v. [read post]