Search for: "People v. Cole"
Results 101 - 120
of 447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 12:10 pm
CTB, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 1:59 pm
Sixteen people were killed in the assault, and 40 were hospitalized. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:52 am
In June, the en banc court heard arguments in Williams v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:46 pm
In Brandenburg v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
” Both cases involve lawsuits by victims of the terrorist bombing of the USS Cole against the Republic of Sudan as a state sponsor of terrorism. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:30 am
Key Findings Personal saving and investment are necessary for long-term economic growth. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:46 am
The 2013 policy change, known as the Cole memo, focused federal attorneys on pursuing cases against people who sold marijuana to minors, took part in interstate trafficking, were members of criminal gangs, or used federal property for marijuana purposes. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm
Is cited in the following article: Cole Antolak, Airport Security: Over-Reaching New Heights, 18 Pitt. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:52 am
And that’s the message sent by the majority in its per curiam opinion in Kisela v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
Key Findings In December 2017, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), arguably the most significant piece of tax legislation in three decades. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Today’s second argument is in Ohio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm
Al-Nashiri is accused of planning the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
Wesley Bosco, Austin Stradling and Colin Cole contributed to this report. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
This objection is mostly misguided.In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:50 pm
Lambert v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:50 pm
Lambert v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:25 am
He also points out that under the California Supreme Court case Ross v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
., married-student housing at a religious college) would better be viewed not as implicating compelled speech, but instead, as David Cole suggested at argument, as raising the question whether the Court would, or might, craft additional exceptions to the general free exercise doctrine of Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
Below is our quarterly newsletter. [read post]
