Search for: "People v. Columbia Research Corp. (1980)" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 8:46 am
In 1981, Judge Vanessa Ruiz of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals successfully argued Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Nation Enterprises, 471 US 539, 558 (1985) (citing Iowa State University Research Foundation v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
When Canadian Courts Cite the Major Philosophers: Who Cites Whom in Canadian Caselaw Queen’s University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-090; CLLR 42:2 Nancy McCormack is an Associate Professor and Law Librarian at Queen’s University. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 637 F.2d 8, 90-91 (2d Cir. 1980).North Carolina: N.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Carry outside the home is the norm throughout most of the country, including many large urban areas, such as the District of Columbia, Chicago, Miami, Philadelphia, San Juan, Seattle, and Houston. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:05 am by Terry Hart
In the 1974 Supreme Court case Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case.”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]