Search for: "People v. Columbia Research Corp. (1980)" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am by Christine Corcos
In 1981, Judge Vanessa Ruiz of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals successfully argued Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
When Canadian Courts Cite the Major Philosophers: Who Cites Whom in Canadian Caselaw Queen’s University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-090; CLLR 42:2 Nancy McCormack is an Associate Professor and Law Librarian at Queen’s University. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 637 F.2d 8, 90-91 (2d Cir. 1980).North Carolina: N.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Nation Enterprises, 471 US 539, 558 (1985) (citing Iowa State University Research Foundation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am by INFORRM
Research & resources A reminder that readers can search the Index on Censorship literary archive for free until 4 May, to mark its 40th anniversary. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Carry outside the home is the norm throughout most of the country, including many large urban areas, such as the District of Columbia, Chicago, Miami, Philadelphia, San Juan, Seattle, and Houston. [read post]
And indeed the SEC did so, responding to Staff experience with that standard by making adjustments to these rules in the 1980s.[11] In 2010, in light of decades of experience with these disclosures, the SEC took further regulatory action in the form of Commission-level guidance regarding when climate-change developments require disclosure under SEC rules. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Last week, Judge Rosenstengel found Wells’ opinion so infected by invalid methodologies and inferences as to be inadmissible under the most recent version of Rule 702.[1] Summary judgment in the trial cases followed.[2] Back in the 1980s, paraquat gained some legal notoriety in one of the most retrograde Rule 702 decisions.[3] Both the herbicide and Rule 702, however, and they remain in wide use. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]