Search for: "People v. Consalvo"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 2:20 am
In People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d 140 (1996), the Court of Appeals considered a trial court’s failure to hold such a hearing after it was requested by the defendant, as well as the lack of necessary evidence supporting the finding that the State of New York had had losses of at least $500,000 due to the defendant’s fraudulent Medicaid billing. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
According to the Court the case should be sent back to determine the restitution owed because “[b]efore a defendant may be directed to pay restitution, a hearing must be held if either: (1) the defendant objects to the amount of restitution and the record is insufficient to establish the proper amount; or (2) the defendant requests a hearing” (People v Morrishill, 127 AD3d 993, 994; see Penal Law § 60.27[2]; People v Consalvo, 89 NY2d… [read post]
