Search for: "People v. Cornish"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2011, 11:00 pm
Hall & Anor v Bull & Anor [2011] EW Misc 2 (CC) (04 January 2011) – Read judgment Judge Andrew Rutherford in the Bristol County Court has held that the devout Christian couple who ran their Cornish hotel according to their Christian principles directly discriminate against a homosexual couple in a civil partnership, when they refused accommodation to them on the basis that they only let double rooms to married couples. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
The first concerns that dress which some people perceived as white and gold while others saw as black and blue. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
Finally, Cornish pasties have been given protected status under EU law. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:00 am
Yet in Frank et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
As explained by Cornish, Llewelyn and Aplin, to fall within section 30 CDPA exception, it is required that (1) the event itself is current (so no extracts from football matches that took place years ago); and (2) the dealing is fair. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
Neither the local authority nor the court is seeking to open windows into people’s souls. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Universal Pictures, as precedent.Nichols v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:40 am
He is believed to have something of a science background and was recently given a fairly easy intellectual property dispute to handle in United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited, noted by this Kat here. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
Engaging Your People? [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Al-Jedda v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
Cornish v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm
., v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
