Search for: "People v. Corrigan"
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
Sayeth me, anyway.We see the judicial equivalent of this in today's opinion by Justice Corrigan: a 236-page (!) [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:56 pm
On Friday, September 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
The majority (led by Justice Corrigan) and dissent (authored by Justice Kennard) disagree on whether there's constitutional or prejudicial error. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:58 am
Two justices -- Justices Corrigan and Chin -- dissent. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
(The caveats in Justice Corrigan's opinion on this point are similarly sensible. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
You can learn more about this from Justice Corrigan's opinion, but the easiest hypo is when you're trying to kill X and X is standing in a tight group of 10 people and you blast your Uzi into the group, killing not only X (who you wanted to kill) but also Y and Z. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:53 am
Following mini-oral argument on the application for leave to appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court held in People v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 12:19 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
And in an opinion (1) by Justice Corrigan, that's (2) less than a dozen double-spaced pages. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:56 am
People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 5:22 pm
We know from the Supreme Court's opinion in Florida v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Supreme Court decision in Berghuis v Smith. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
On July 31, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a 4-3 opinion in People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
Because Justice Baxter, joined by Justices Chin and Corrigan, also writes separately to say how they'd decide a hypothetical case -- not present here -- involving different facts. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
National Bank Assn.) and for the worst majority opinion (People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:57 am
People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 1:47 am
Corrigan, (KS Sup. [read post]
