Search for: "People v. Cox" Results 1 - 20 of 462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 7:08 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Hearsay only applies to statements by people—computer-generated statements don’t have a hearsay problem. __ This seems like a win, of sorts, for platforms, although not a great result for Cox specifically. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
In practice, it has been alleged the company went to great lengths to avoid disconnecting people with the court acknowledging  "Cox formally adopted a repeat infringer 'policy,' but ... made every effort to avoid reasonably implementing that policy ...... [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:36 am by Tracy Coenen
On May 13, 2013, Cox filed a complaint in federal court against me,  and against a bunch of fine people (WIPO, Peter Michaelson, Marc Randazza, Kashmir Hill, Forbes, Kevin Padrick, David Aman, David [...] [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I just wanted to thank the many people who helped me with Obsidian Finance v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Biofuels Digest on the Gevo / Butamax patent war on bio-isobutanol Of relevance to the 2012 IPBiz post is news on Nov. 6, 2014 about the stroke risk associated with COX-2 inhibitors, reported in the story COX-2 inhibitors linked to increased risk of stroke death , wherein a paper in the journal Neurology foundThe study shows that people who were current users of COX-2 inhibitors were 19% more likely to die after a stroke than people who did not use… [read post]