Search for: "People v. Crisp" Results 81 - 100 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Arguably the closest comparison is to cases dealing with material-assistance-to-terrorist-organization prosecutions like U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Arguably the closest comparison is to cases dealing with material-assistance-to-terrorist-organization prosecutions like U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Judge Claire Eagan’s opinion lays this out in a crisp, readable 29 pages. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm
ConfessionI don’t often enjoy reading other people's blogs. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  In this environment, people have to think carefully before making decisions that might affect their own financial futures. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
At the argument, Judge Roberts made a crisp and convincing argument that the lower court was wrong. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
You should get in the habit of frequently writing shorter items—a paragraph at the end of your class-session notes distilling your thoughts about a case or a professor’s presentation of it; an email to a classmate or a professor explaining why you were confused, and posing a crisp question the answer to which should resolve the confusion; a letter to the editor or an Op Ed piece (whether ever submitted or not) commenting on some recent legal development, etc. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  HQ images are ubiquitous to young people; poor quality clips lose their impact when learners are distracted by the bad image and sound quality. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
Deanne Maynard, co-chair of Morrison & Foerster’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice, has argued 14 cases before the Supreme Court since her first oral argument in 2004. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 9:17 am
"The case of The Estate of Tammy Evans v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]