Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 1 - 20 of 6,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am by Eleonora Rosati
FanFirm commenced proceedings against Fanatics for:Trade mark infringement;Rectification of the Register through cancellation of Fanatics’ trade mark registrations;Misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of the Australian Consumer Law; andPassing off,while Fanatics cross-claimed with the same allegations against FanFirm.Justice Helen Rofe oversaw the proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia, issuing her decision on 17 July 2024. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
The Italian legal proceedings Between 1966 and 1970, a first set of criminal proceedings took place in Italy, as the people suspected of having received and handled Victorious Youth faced accusations of fencing cultural property that belonged to the State.[11] The defendants were acquitted, due to a lack of evidence that Victorious Youth even existed (let alone that it was found in Italian waters). [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:09 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
The trial judge uses something called the Daubert standard (in reference to a case called Daubert v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:49 pm by Bill Marler
(Goulet V, King LA, Vaillant V, de Valk H. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
These power differentials influence the nature of cross-race interactions. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:06 pm by Jacob Fishman
Empirical chapters then apply these and other explanations to diverse issue areas and cross-cutting issues, often using newly developed datasets or original case study research. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
The Regulation Platform creates and consumes key discursive tropes: “safe, secure and trustworthy;” "people-centered;" "benefit sustainable development;" "digital divide;" "fair, inclusive, responsible and effective data governance;" These are used to develop guard rails (eg here) and group discipline through controlled systems of assessment that reainforce normative collective solidarity to the values encased in these discursive tropes. [read post]