Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 241 - 260
of 5,548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2024, 5:38 pm
Precedent in Trans-border Jurisdiction The ICC has previously navigated similar jurisdictional complexities, most notably in its investigation of alleged crimes against the Rohingya people, offering a potential precedent for addressing the Israel-Palestine situation. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
NetChoice and NetChoice v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 8:54 am
District Court for the Northern District of California in its ruling in the Epic v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm
Did it originate with post-Brown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 7:13 am
In 1985, the pivotal legal case Handschu v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
Why not supposedly harmful cross-border cultural influences (dangerous foreign ideas and art forms are "invading" our people's minds!)? [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 6:48 am
#ThanksPETA Case Citations: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am
Overbroad Scope of Evidence Gathering Powers Will Enable Domestic and Cross-Border Spying on Acts of Expression: The open-ended scope of Chapters IV & V risks undermining law enforcement cooperation on actual cybercrime offenses by diluting resources. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm
Drawing on its decision in People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:25 am
On the other costs, the lease clause was identically worded to that in Sella House Ltd v Mears (1988) 21 HLR 147. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm
In People v Lester (N.Y. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
”Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:29 am
The Doe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am
FanFirm commenced proceedings against Fanatics for:Trade mark infringement;Rectification of the Register through cancellation of Fanatics’ trade mark registrations;Misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of the Australian Consumer Law; andPassing off,while Fanatics cross-claimed with the same allegations against FanFirm.Justice Helen Rofe oversaw the proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia, issuing her decision on 17 July 2024. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
The Importance of Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The Italian legal proceedings Between 1966 and 1970, a first set of criminal proceedings took place in Italy, as the people suspected of having received and handled Victorious Youth faced accusations of fencing cultural property that belonged to the State.[11] The defendants were acquitted, due to a lack of evidence that Victorious Youth even existed (let alone that it was found in Italian waters). [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:09 am
The trial judge uses something called the Daubert standard (in reference to a case called Daubert v. [read post]
