Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:36 pm
The resulting landmark decision of Loving v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:36 pm
The resulting landmark decision of Loving v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From Troutt v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
But under cross-examination, [he] conceded he was unsure how much time passed before Peoples entered. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
Case citation: GiveForward, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:33 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Their position was analogous to that of the claimant in Burnip v Birmingham City Council, who herself required overnight care. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
From the case Commil v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:02 pm
In Resch v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 5:09 am
In Church of the Holy Cross v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:41 pm
The trial court relied upon People v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Cross-published at Tech Policy Press. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am
" Furthermore, how do we know when we cross the "sufficiently substantial" risk of bias line? [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
