Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 321 - 340 of 6,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
But under cross-examination, [he] conceded he was unsure how much time passed before Peoples entered. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Orin Kerr
Relying on the concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by jpfaff
" Furthermore, how do we know when we cross the "sufficiently substantial" risk of bias line? [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Adam Zimmerman
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]