Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 341 - 360
of 6,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The Problem with Affirmative Action After Grutter: Some Reflections on Fisher v. University of Texas
6 Mar 2012, 8:30 pm
Nonwhite people and White people acquire cross-racial understanding. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:33 pm
But, in the case of people using networks, at what point does it cross the line into violations of personal privacy? [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:50 pm
In Edwin Cheek v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:24 pm
People care. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:38 pm
(See People v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 7:42 am
Static Control Components, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
If a new trial occurs, Plaintiff may cross-examine Dr. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
Peters v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
Peters v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am
One of the most famous and compelling defenses of the unitary executive comes from Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:38 am
The match-up was a classic one, my firm against Akin Gump: BigLaw v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:30 am
Duncan Kennedy, The Bitter Ironies of Williams v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
In many cases people do this without really understanding the consequences of what they are doing.The problems of using joint tenancies with children are again illustrated in a recent British Columbia case, Turner v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
In State v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 12:32 pm
Two cases, People v Torres and People v Roldan, outline when this might happen. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
Vidal v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
By contrast, if police took a statement in violation of Miranda, the statement would be inadmissible in the government’s affirmative case but admissible on cross-examination of the defendant, under Harris v. [read post]
