Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 361 - 380 of 5,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 9:09 pm
:We also find reversible error in the trial court's almost continuous interference, during cross examination of the People's witnesses, in defense counsel's exploration of issues relevant to defendant's intent to sell (see People v Canto, 31 AD3d 312 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 900 [2006]; People v Melendez, 31 AD3d 186 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 927 [2006]; People v Retamozzo, 25 AD3d 73 [2005]; People… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:06 am by Stephen Bilkis
  While several witnesses testified that the defendant was at the scene, on cross examination, the witness statements were not consistent. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Paul Luvera provides a good "cost v. benefits" sample cross examination. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
Paul Luvera provides a good "cost v. benefits" sample cross examination. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm by Aaron Mackey
We have a fully briefed summary judgment motion on the First Amendment and the government cross-moved to dismiss the case. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Yesterday, the Tenth Circuit voted 5–4 not to rehear the Utah roadside cross memorial case, American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Officers came to defendant's house for a knock-and-talk, and they saw people fleeing and smelled marijuana. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:55 am by Lewis Gainor
Many people believe that crossing state lines is what determines whether conduct can result in federal criminal charges. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
The people have made their unequivocal choice.Today we will sign treaties on the accession of the Donetsk People’s Republic, Lugansk People’s Republic, Zaporozhye Region and Kherson Region to the Russian Federation. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
In the case at bar, the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding sole custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record as was held in analogous cases of Matter of Peoples v Bideau, Pierre–Paul v Boursiquot, Matter of Ramirez v Velez and Matter of Paul v Sawyer. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:52 pm
That witness could be cross-examined about specific instances of truthful conduct by McNamee. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 12:55 pm
  A view supported by some very bright jurists, and one that's unambiguously the law applied to millions of people. [read post]