Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 21 - 40 of 6,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm by Roy Black
The people who need it the most just don’t show up. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:13 am by Marty Lederman
”  And the record indicates that at a ceremony in 1985 attended by over 400 people, “the historic Peace Cross Memorial was re-dedicated in honor and memory of all veterans. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:12 pm
Here’s the issue that drew my attention to the “rummy name” case, People v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Kanhai Court Discusses Whether Business Records are an Exception to the Hearsay Rule under the Principle of Crawford v Washington The criminal defendant was arrested and charged for one count of of driving a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol DWI under section 1192(1) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The New York Court of Appeals takes up that issue, holding that when identification is an issue in a criminal case and the identifying witness and defendant appear to be of different races, a party is entitled to a charge on the risks inherent in cross-racial identification.The case is People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 4:58 am by Andrew Woods
  This would not be unlike company policies in the wake of US v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Some people gather there every Easter for religious services. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 9:13 pm
Getting pregnant counts as "great bodily injury".Just so you know. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:07 am by Marci Hamilton
The Nones are not likely to buy the duplicitous argument that a cross is nonreligious. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:38 pm
  It's a big hassle for automobiles/passengers/pedestrians to wait at a train crossing for a long, long time. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
    I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]