Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 21 - 40 of 5,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Conversely, therefore, pre-cut federal funding of the hard sciences can be understood as cross-subsidizing the humanities. [read post]
22 May 2025, 3:45 am by SHG
It’s been clear for a while now that the Trump administration ignored Judge Boasberg’s order, violated Judge Xinis’ order and even ignored the Supreme Court’s decision in Noem v. [read post]
15 May 2025, 1:21 pm
” The amendment was added to the Constitution specifically to overrule the Supreme Court’s notorious 1857 decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 2:53 pm by Ilya Somin
" Yesterday, the Trump administration finally partially won one of these AEA cases, because Judge Stephanie Haines of the Western District of Pennsylvania (a Trump appointee) ruled in ASR v. [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am by Mary Anne Franks
If there is going to be an effective online resistance to the fascist takeover of the United States, it will not be through the pretense of the “digital public square” that disguises corporate greed as the will of the people. [read post]
14 May 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But it's pretty much the remedy the Court approved in 2017 in Sessions v. [read post]
13 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
People often misperceive emojis as some second-tier form of communication with no legal implications of their usage. [read post]
13 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
People often misperceive emojis as some second-tier form of communication with no legal implications of their usage. [read post]
12 May 2025, 10:33 am
” It is this essential and important encounter to which we must guide and accompany all the holy People of God entrusted to our care. [read post]
12 May 2025, 2:03 am by INFORRM
This is the first time that NCERT announced non-compliance activities related to cross-border transfers of personal information. [read post]
10 May 2025, 10:16 am by familoo
In the first, M v F [2025] EWFC 114 (B), HHJ Owens was critical of a relatively junior solicitor advocate for his cross examination of a vulnerable witness in private law proceedings. [read post]