Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 61 - 80 of 5,466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
Lena makes another tactical decision:After giving his testimony, Lena told the court and the jury he would not answer any of the People’s questions during cross-examination. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm by Roy Black
Rarely do I read any textbooks or law review articles on cross. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am by Amy Howe
-Mexico border at ports of entry every day, and hundreds of thousands of people are caught every year attempting to cross the border illegally. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 3:55 am by SHG
The new case, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
  But in the end, she just says that since the evidence of guilt was far from clear (which is definitely true), the trial court's prejudicial comments about the defense's cross-examination of the expert were prejudicial and required reversal. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am by David Super
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in an important Social Security Disability Insurance case, Biestek v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:28 pm
Valenzuela here evaded police, drove 65 miles per hour on residential streets running through stop signs, and had kids and crossing guards scrambling out of her way to avoid being hit. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am by Nate Persily
[Cross-posted at electionlawblog.com]On this tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
 Yours truly crossed there many a time.The downside of that practice was that inattentive people could be hit. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm by Brian Shiffrin
A Sandoval hearing is designed to let the accused make an informed choice whether he should take the stand prior to testifying by providing a pre-trial determination of the permissible scope of cross-examination of the accused (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). [read post]