Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
Lena makes another tactical decision:After giving his testimony, Lena told the court and the jury he would not answer any of the People’s questions during cross-examination. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:58 pm
Rarely do I read any textbooks or law review articles on cross. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
In United States Forest Service v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:09 am
-Mexico border at ports of entry every day, and hundreds of thousands of people are caught every year attempting to cross the border illegally. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:14 am
Additional Resources: Spence v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:14 am
Additional Resources: Spence v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 8:42 am
Shen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 3:55 am
The new case, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
But in the end, she just says that since the evidence of guilt was far from clear (which is definitely true), the trial court's prejudicial comments about the defense's cross-examination of the expert were prejudicial and required reversal. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in an important Social Security Disability Insurance case, Biestek v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:28 pm
Valenzuela here evaded police, drove 65 miles per hour on residential streets running through stop signs, and had kids and crossing guards scrambling out of her way to avoid being hit. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
[Cross-posted at electionlawblog.com]On this tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
Yours truly crossed there many a time.The downside of that practice was that inattentive people could be hit. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm
People v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
A Sandoval hearing is designed to let the accused make an informed choice whether he should take the stand prior to testifying by providing a pre-trial determination of the permissible scope of cross-examination of the accused (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:23 am
Ayres's September 26 ruling in People v. [read post]