Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 81 - 100 of 6,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2024, 12:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Why didn’t people test 512(j) in court first? [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:22 am by Bill Marler
USDA-FSIS is advising delis to not use any opened deli products because recalled products can cross-contaminate other deli meats and cheeses. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 5:38 pm by Smadar Ben-Natan
Precedent in Trans-border Jurisdiction The ICC has previously navigated similar jurisdictional complexities, most notably in its investigation of alleged crimes against the Rohingya people, offering a potential precedent for addressing the Israel-Palestine situation. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 8:54 am by Mario Zúñiga
District Court for the Northern District of California in its ruling in the Epic v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:50 am by Ilya Somin
Why not supposedly harmful cross-border cultural influences (dangerous foreign ideas and art forms are "invading" our people's minds!)? [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am by Katitza Rodriguez
   Overbroad Scope of Evidence Gathering Powers Will Enable Domestic and Cross-Border Spying on Acts of Expression: The open-ended scope of Chapters IV & V risks undermining law enforcement cooperation on actual cybercrime offenses by diluting resources. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 11:25 am by Giles Peaker
On the other costs, the lease clause was identically worded to that in Sella House Ltd v Mears (1988) 21 HLR 147. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am by Eleonora Rosati
FanFirm commenced proceedings against Fanatics for:Trade mark infringement;Rectification of the Register through cancellation of Fanatics’ trade mark registrations;Misleading and deceptive conduct in breach of the Australian Consumer Law; andPassing off,while Fanatics cross-claimed with the same allegations against FanFirm.Justice Helen Rofe oversaw the proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia, issuing her decision on 17 July 2024. [read post]