Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 101 - 120 of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 2:59 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
") I hope that if you think that, you also agree — and many don't — with what Justice Scalia said at oral argument in Salazar v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Although the People demonstrated due diligence in attempting to locate the victim for trial (see People v Arroyo, 54 NY2d 567, 571, cert denied 456 US 979), the court unduly restricted defense counsel's cross-examination of the victim at the preliminary hearing, and thus the admission in evidence of the preliminary hearing testimony deprived defendant of his right of confrontation (see People v Simmons, 36 NY2d 126, 130-131). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:17 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(Forbes Cross-Post) California’s New Law Shows It’s Not Easy To Regulate Revenge Porn (Forbes Cross-Post) Court Denies Restraining Order Against Ex-Boyfriend Who Threatened to Post Revenge Porn — EC v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:01 pm
 It's just a crazy -- and presumably -- unexpected twist in the law that results from a statutory patchwork of cross-references to which the Legislature presumably paid no (or almost no) attention.So Tirey -- who's been convicted of lewd conduct with two girls under 14 -- challenges the statute as a denial of equal protection. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Elie Mystal
I’m just saying that if a religious symbol can be “secularized” at all, isn’t the cross pretty much already there when it comes to memorializing dead people? [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:01 am by rdasgupta
Sure Superman can see through walls and fly faster than a speeding bullet, but how would he hold up on cross examination? [read post]