Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 121 - 140 of 5,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2023, 9:03 am by INFORRM
The TV presenter and naturalist Chris Packham sued the Editor of Country Squire Magazine over three allegations published on its website which alleged, among other things, that he had misled people in order to raise money for a tiger rescue charity. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Underwood, the Supreme Court invalidated a similar provision of the Alabama constitution that disenfranchised people convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The article reported on criminal proceedings at which Mr Seeley had given evidence for the prosecution, focusing on an allegation which had been put to Mr Seeley in cross-examination. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he general rule is that testimony of a witness’ opinion is not admissible into evidence” People v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:48 am by Thomas Repczynski, Esq.
  The earlier piece was intended for legal practitioners, complete with case and statutory citations and cross-references to scholarly sources upon which I relied at the time. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
A chaotic or open border makes it impossible to screen out people who really do very urgently need to be screened out. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:39 am by Matthew Guariglia
In South Africa, the High Court found that “no lawful authority has been demonstrated to trespass onto the privacy rights or the freedom of expression rights of anyone, including South Africans whose communications cross-cross the world by means of bulk [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm by Phil Dixon
For-cause strikes of unvaccinated jurors did not implicate fair-cross-section rights U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:31 pm by Marc DeGirolami
This is demonstrated, for example, by analysis of Chief Justice Vaughan's opinion in Thomas v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:29 pm by Ilya Somin
I reached out to Jack then (and on some later occasions) precisely for the purpose of engaging in cross-ideological outreach, so that I would not just be presenting my ideas to people likely to already agree with them. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Charles V, Ferdinand and Isabella’s grandson, added a Renaissance place to the center of the compound [read post]