Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:30 pm
The decision to hear Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
” On cross examination, she agreed he also used the phrase, “If I had a gun. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
Cross-posted from SCOTUS Blog, where this essay is part of its special Black History Month coverage:In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Davis v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm
The court noted that there are unusual circumstances in which silence will be admissible (People v Rothschild, 35 NY2d 355 [1974] [defendant police officer had a duty to report to his supervisors if he was taking the bribe money as part of a "sting"]; People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 [1980] [defendant told police he shot victim during an altercation, properly cross-examined on his failure to make claim that victim was trying to rob him, as he… [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:49 am
The question presented in State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 3:29 pm
Who could possibly think that not letting anyone on the defendant's side hear the testimony of the key prosecution witness before cross-examining her was okay? [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 6:18 am
That Cross is now the subject of a constitutional challenge by a national atheist group.The case is American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
And I have serious concerns that, at least in some cases (though by no means in most of them), that decision might even result in people innocent of an offense being convicted. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:09 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
Although White v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
Don't cross the line for no reason.In this case, as in many others, the defendant has been caught dead to rights. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
For crossing an intersection when the "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing.Yet, notwithstanding the incredibly tiny monetary interest at stake, the opinion may well have more practical significance to most of us than nearly every single one of the other appellate opinions we read.Pamela Monk got her $25 ticket because a police officer saw her enter the crosswalk when the red "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing, and was in it's "countdown" mode; e.g.,… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
Can't wait to see how that works out for you.True to form, the defendant only asked one question of the witness on cross-examination: "Can you shrug your shoulders like this? [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
And New York law, as interpreted by People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
If free speech is for people, and corporations aren't people, then is there an element of hypocrisy in supporting a lawsuit by a corporation asserting its right to use its wealth and power with respect to a contentious political issue? [read post]
