Search for: "People v. Cruz" Results 1 - 20 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
There I argued (among other things) that the amicus brief of Senators Hawley, Cruz, and Lee is peculiar in that it is almost entirely directed against the undue burden test adopted by SCOTUS in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 8:22 am
Garcia-Cruz. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That means it is unconstitutional, whether or not Roe v Wade is re-engineered or overruled.This revolting endangerment of young girls’ lives is particularly troubling when considering the irrational measures taken by Texas officials in dealing with COVID-19, which as of last month included Governor Abbott’s executive order banning the use of vaccine mandates in the public sector and Senator Ted Cruz’s proposed federal legislation banning mask mandates, vaccine… [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
” On the other side of that coin, people feel quite comfortable saying terrible things if they are not worried about being judged harshly.One particularly awful example of this phenomenon is the Supreme Court’s infamous 1986 Bowers v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am by Paul Cassell
By ignoring the "rights creating" language found in the CVRA, the Eleventh Circuit en banc misapplied Alexander v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Currently the company does not allow people who are under this age to create an account on the platform. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:22 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
If Ted Cruz or Josh Hawley run instead, people will also challenge their eligibility under Section Three. [read post]