Search for: "People v. Cummings"
Results 81 - 100
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2020, 2:15 pm
Van Buren arises out of a criminal case involving a police sergeant in Cumming, Georgia. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:31 pm
City of Cumming, 212 F.3d 1332, 1333 (11th Cir. 2000) (recognizing a First Amendment right to photograph or videotape police conduct); Fordyce v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Sheff: question is ex ante costs of rigor v. ex post costs of resolving conflicts; reasonable people disagree. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:19 pm
The Case: - Two-JD couple, solid credentials: Georgetown (cum laude) and NYU Law for her; Columbia and HLS (both magna) for him. - The groom is an associate at WilmerHale, where he worked on an amicus brief filed in Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
To review the Court’s opinion, see Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
To review the Court’s opinion, see Trump v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
Davis argued on the losing side of Brown v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:30 am
In an earlier post, Josh noted that Texas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:28 am
Cummings v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Someone will go seriously old skool and play Cumming v Danson or Say v Smith, the quiet one in the corner will drone on about how everyone else always forgets AG Securities, there is always an argument about Bruton, but (and if there is a point to this introduction, this is it) there is now a new giant on the scene, one judgment to rule them all and in its 9 strong constitution bind them - the Supreme Court decision in Pinnock (you might like to check out our note on the… [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
The Anti-Evasion Principle Although the word abridging bars evasions, there's also a longstanding constitutional principle that government cannot use private parties to do its dirty work: In Cummings v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 1:55 pm
In Eastland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 9:31 am
” Cummings v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 5:06 am
Additionally, the Michigan Supreme Court may overturn McCormick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 10:51 am
First, in discussing Chiafalo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 5:12 am
Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 11:15 am
: Rights and Remedies after State v. [read post]
