Search for: "People v. Daniel"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 8:37 am
The defendants in Nucci v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:28 am
In Daniel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
I covered the oral argument for this blog; other coverage comes from Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:02 am
In its decision of 9 March 2017 in Rolf Anders Daniel Pihl v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:20 pm
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:45 am
Cohen v. [read post]
16 Oct 2021, 1:01 am
A report released during WWII noted that “Most people in this country [i.e., the U.S.], including educated people, know little or nothing about our overseas possessions. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:13 am
The European Court oh Human Rights (ECtHR) has tackled again the tricky subject of intermediary liability in the case of Rolf Anders Daniel Pihl v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
There's been a lot of analysis of the disastrous impact of the Supreme Court's 5 to 4 Concepcion v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
NY - PEOPLE v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:12 am
This is the third post in our post-hearing coverage of Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 1:28 pm
Morel AFP v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 7:04 pm
By Daniel RichardsonSouthwick v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:29 am
She also argues that the Court of Appeals got it wrong in concluding that Judge Scheindlin had violated the Code of Conduct in suggesting that the lawyers file the Floyd action and mark it as a related case to another stop and frisk matter that she was handling, Daniels v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
However, the court has done no more than confirm the basic principle that human rights are for all, not just for people we like. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
July 6, 2020) People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
” Cites to Howard v AOL, KinderStart v. [read post]
