Search for: "People v. Daniels (1991)"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Co. v Zuk, 78 NY2d 41 [1991]; People v Licitra, 47 NY2d 554 [1979]), absent any proof that the defendant had any medical training or knowledge of anatomy or physiology regarding the risks of a leg wound involving the femoral artery, and that such involvement could likely be fatal. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Garland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
By Daniel RichardsonDeSantis v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am
Georgia, 501 U.S. 529 (1991). [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
(Thanks to Sina Safvati, Daniel Simkin, and Sabine Tsuruda, the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students who worked on the brief.) [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 3:30 am
And yet, a 1991 Supreme Court case--Cohen v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:55 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991). [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 12:42 pm
by Daniel Marx In February 2012, following oral argument, the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
Daniels, 309 A.2d at 741. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:21 am
Test Masters Educational Services, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
Daniel Berrigan and the Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
Abigail v Lapin [1934] AC 491. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
Supreme Court had finally weighed in and the Indigenous people of Washington had won yet again.Charles Wilkinson was a legal scholar and advocate for Indigenous peoples. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:30 am
Gramley, 929 F.2d 350, 351 (7th Cir. 1991). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Continental Grain Co., 587 A.2d 702, 704 (Pa. 1991) (emphasis added) (citation and quotation marks omitted).Another equivalent standard for punitive damages is that the plaintiff is “substantially certain” to be injured. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Grose, 586 So. 2d 196, 198 (Ala. 1991). [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Daniel T. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
