Search for: "People v. Davis (1987)"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
In the 1987 case, South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Davis, 44 N.Y.2d 269, 274 [1978]; People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 8:19 am
Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937); Helvering v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept 2006]… [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
App. 336 (1987). [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Isleib, 319 N.C. 634 (1987). [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
Most people seem to agree that the county clerk, Kim Davis, ought to be required to fulfill the functions of her office. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
App. 336 (1987). [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
Consider Davis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
" Caballes, 543 U.S. at 407-08 (citing People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
Davies v Wilson. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
”) Davis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Davis (1937) and South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 9:07 am
Barrett, 479 U.S. 523, 529 (1987) (holding in the context of the invocation of the right to counsel that “[i]nterpretation is only required where the defendant's words, understood as ordinary people would understand them, are ambiguous”). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Davis, 326 F.3d 361 (2nd Cir. 2003)(same). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
Davis v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
, Wellman v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
