Search for: "People v. Davis (1988)"
Results 1 - 20
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
”[7] By “traditional notions,” the Adopting Release refers to other SEC regulations and relevant Supreme Court case law (in particular, TSC Industries v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
(Halkbank) v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
§ 1988. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
After a divorce, people move on. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 7:25 am
” People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Well, the U.K. copyright actually did expire in 1987, but one year later, the British Parliament introduced a unique exception to the Copyright Designs and Patents Act of 1988 in favor of the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 5:20 pm
” (Davis v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
But few people ever attempt to convert such decisions into a common currency. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
” People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
Davis L. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]