Search for: "People v. Davis (1988)"
Results 61 - 80
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze the essential issues raised in Spokeo v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Oct. 11, 2011), Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Davis L. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
His final period of imprisonment was in stark contrast to the 18 years he spent on Robben Island and at Pollsmoor Prison in Tokai, Cape Town from 1982-1988: “[I]n December 1988 Mandela was moved to Victor Verster Prison near Paarl. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
But few people ever attempt to convert such decisions into a common currency. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
" (People v Selassie, 140 Misc.2d 616, 619 [NY Sup Ct Bronx County 1988].) [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Unlike Near, in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Karcher v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
” People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
In this environment, people have to think carefully before making decisions that might affect their own financial futures. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Laws by their very nature divide people into different categories and subject them to differing treatment, but not all laws violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
Koshenina v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 507 P.2d 653, 660 (Cal. 1973). [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
