Search for: "People v. Davis (1988)"
Results 121 - 140
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
Oct. 11, 2011), Davis v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
Koshenina v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Silicon Valley billionaire investor Tim Draper recently unveiled a plan to divide up California into six separate states because, in his view, “California’s diverse population and economies [have] rendered the state nearly ungovernable. [read post]
