Search for: "People v. Davis (1988)"
Results 121 - 140
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 2012 in Arizona v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
He says, for example, drawing on the gender-based peremptory case, J.E.B. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
Koshenina v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Silicon Valley billionaire investor Tim Draper recently unveiled a plan to divide up California into six separate states because, in his view, “California’s diverse population and economies [have] rendered the state nearly ungovernable. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Or take Frisby v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
” A state legislature’s constitutional inability to favor particular federal legislative candidates and disfavor others explains why the Supreme Court held a dozen years ago in Cook v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
In this environment, people have to think carefully before making decisions that might affect their own financial futures. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
One such setting is raised by an interesting and important case, Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
