Search for: "People v. Davis (1988)" Results 161 - 180 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2018, 4:56 am by Kathy Kapusta
Reviving her suit for a second time, the appeals court reversed summary judgment and remanded (Davis v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People’s Bank v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  To be sure, the Complaint characterizes Ranked-Choice Voting as “exotic” and points out that some people find Ranked-Choice Voting ballots complicated. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The jury system as understood in America seems to me as direct and extreme a consequence of the dogma of the sovereignty of the people as universal suffrage. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]