Search for: "People v. Davis (1996)" Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
San Bernardino Valley College, 92 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 1996) (which the Report did not discuss either). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, 163 F.3d 341, 360 (6th Cir. 1996) (likewise). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Super. 1996) (following Thomas' phrasing); Edgar v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm by Gideon
No specific showing of prejudice was required in Davis v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Lyle Denniston on the Supreme Court’s scotusblog suggests that the court has effectively “launched years of new lawsuits to sort it all out”, and the increasing use of technology in law-enforcement, and in other private areas of people’s lives, seems to indicate that this will be fertile ground for future litigation. [read post]