Search for: "People v. Davis (1998)" Results 1 - 20 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am by Susan Brenner
Davis, 19 Cal.4th 301 (California Court of Appeals 1998). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:03 pm by admin
In the documentary, Davis says people have been “coming after” him for twenty-years. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(Id. at pp. 53–54; accord, Davis v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
” On 8 to 10 November 2021, Saini J heard the trial in the harassment and libel case of Davies v Carter, judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 15 November 2021. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Issue 1: the interpretation of damage under section 13 DPA 1998 Section 13 of the DPA 1998 lies at the heart of this appeal. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  The State argued that the good faith exception to the warrant clause applied, relying on Davis v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
Davis (1998) 19 Cal.4th 301, 305; Williams, at pp. 782-783.) [read post]