Search for: "People v. Davis (1998)" Results 1 - 20 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[9] Thus, for instance, that some people are offended or alienated by an employee's religion does not justify the employer in firing the employee. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
”  Joseph Durso, “Chronicling Splendor and Its Dissolution,” NY Times, Aug 30, 1998. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
” On 8 to 10 November 2021, Saini J heard the trial in the harassment and libel case of Davies v Carter, judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 15 November 2021. [read post]
15 May 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Davie Donaldson, a young campaigner for Travellers rights, argued that people in the “settled community” needed to be more willing to meet Travellers: “We are the same as everyone else. [read post]
15 May 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Davie Donaldson, a young campaigner for Travellers rights, argued that people in the “settled community” needed to be more willing to meet Travellers: “We are the same as everyone else. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
In fact, so challenging that after an extensive review of the Strasbourg and national case law, the majority preferred not to actually decide it (see paras 82-111) it seems to me that, on balance, the ECtHR authorities suggest that the facts of this case might well fall within the ambit of article 8 and Strasbourg has produced few cases in which an article 14 claim has failed because the facts have been held to have fallen outside the ambit of a substantive right (although Botta v Italy… [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the 1998 case of Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. [read post]