Search for: "People v. Davis (1998)" Results 61 - 80 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
In fact, so challenging that after an extensive review of the Strasbourg and national case law, the majority preferred not to actually decide it (see paras 82-111) it seems to me that, on balance, the ECtHR authorities suggest that the facts of this case might well fall within the ambit of article 8 and Strasbourg has produced few cases in which an article 14 claim has failed because the facts have been held to have fallen outside the ambit of a substantive right (although Botta v Italy… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Merrill and Title 15 Section 1692 that when people enter into any dealings with agents, the people better investigate the authority and limits of authority that the agents possess. [read post]