Search for: "People v. Davis (1998)"
Results 61 - 80
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
People's exhibit 1B, a 30–round detachable magazine, was attached to the gun when taken into the officer's custody. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:02 am
Davis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Lago Vista Independent School District (1998) and Davis v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 4:15 am
(People v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:22 am
Gabrielsen (California Court of Appeals 1998) 68 Cal. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm
As outlined in People v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
SeeRestatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, reporters notes to comment l (1998). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
And there are real people in those jobs, people with families to feed. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
Prince v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:54 pm
People have moved on. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Georgia and McClesky v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
Davis, 19 Cal.4th 301 (California Court of Appeals 1998). [read post]
