Search for: "People v. Davis (1998)" Results 81 - 100 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Citing Mark Foy's Limited v Davies Coop and Company Limited (1956) 95 CLR 190 - "The public...are being invited to purchase goods of the defendant which are to be distinguished from the goods of other traders partly because they are described as "Tub Happy" goods. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
And one needs only to look at a lawsuit brought by singer-actress Ginger Rogers to see how the court may view such use.Dancing with the StarsIn Rogers v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had a piece “Zoom Alternatives: 5 Options For People Who Care About Security And Privacy”. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
The Data Protection Act 1998 is increasingly being deployed as part of a claimant’s arsenal in defamation claims, writes Robin Hopkins, a barrister at 11KBW. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Phoenix, 154 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 1998) (applying void-for-vagueness analysis in a nonpublic forum); Miller v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Elizabeth McNamara, Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, New York, NY Represents media companies, taking a different view. [read post]