Search for: "People v. Davis (1998)"
Results 121 - 140
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2010, 8:19 am
Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937); Helvering v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
“That we'd end up like India and Egypt where people don't invent things. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
Davis, 27 Ohio App. 3d 65 (1985) (affirm [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Justice Davis (joined by Justice Clifford) wanted a limitation. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Evan Davis, Partner, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, and former Counsel to then New York State Governor Mario M. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:03 am
Yet, in Blanch v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:53 pm
At the same time, Wendy Davis reports on how a Conn. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
At least 69 people became ill. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
Dretke, and Snyder v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:10 am
App. 1998); Klein v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
Davis, 326 F.3d 361 (2nd Cir. 2003)(same). [read post]
