Search for: "People v. Diaz"
Results 81 - 100
of 388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Yesterday, the next hearing in Wikimedia Foundation v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 4:02 pm
On February 15, 1990 the case of the People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
So what can possibly be at issue in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:33 pm
Today's IRAP v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
In Robert Young v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:08 pm
I’ll have more to say about this shortly, but here are a few immediate thoughts: Padilla is kind of an interesting counterpoint to last year’s monumental Sixth Amendment ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Diaz, 922 F2d 998 (2nd Cir.). [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
People v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 8:39 am
For example the Court of Appeals in People v Rawlins and People v Meekins (10 N.Y.3d 136 [2/19/2008]), considered how Crawford applies two categories of evidence: DNA reports and , fingerprints, comparisons. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
The Court then determined that this error was harmless, since the defendant had confessed.Whether the holding of People v Brown (13 NY3d 332) was correct will likely be decided by the Supreme Court in Williams v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
White v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
The State argued that in this way the rule was akin to the notice and demand statutes approved in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:31 am
"
Citation: U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:29 pm
The book includes Washington cases, such as Washington v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
Over the weekend the New York Times ran a story by Adam Liptak previewing a US Supreme Court case ("Justices revisit rule requiring lab testimony," Dec. 19) called Briscoe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
(Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
