Search for: "People v. District Court of State" Results 1 - 20 of 14,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch's concurrence pointed out: Members of this Court have long held that, "'[a]nytime a State is enjoined by a court from effectuating statutes enacted by representatives of its people, it suffers a form of irreparable injury.'" Maryland v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Under similar circumstances, other district courts have determined Volokh had standing to intervene [citing cases -EV]. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
It seems quite likely, as one district court suggested in passing in 1964, that the terms of the statute are both unconstitutionally vague and in any event unlikely to survive the far stricter standards contemporary courts place on such content-based restrictions on speech…. [3.] [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Each of these three episodes highlights how underexplained the Court’s Trump v Anderson decision last month was. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which reversed. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Supreme Court cases—especially the 2021 ruling in Tandon v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]