Search for: "People v. Dotson"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Dotson (Ohio. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Jim Dotson, described the legislation as a reaction to the BDS movement. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Dotson et al, Brand Attitudes and Search Engine Queries, 37 J. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:09 am
That litigation will continue, thanks to the Court of Appeals, which finds her second lawsuit against the City of Syracuse states a plausible claim for discrimination.The case is Dotson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:57 am
Dotson et al, Brand Attitudes and Search Engine Queries, 37 Journal of Interactive Marketing 105 (2016), provides further support for this conclusion. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:28 am
One example is Schriro v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:57 am
Dotson. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:34 am
They had the opportunity to fix that mistake in Dotson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:00 pm
App. 113; 418 N.W.2d 695 (1987) and People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
The trial court disagrees, Dotson is convicted, and appeals. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
AFFIRMED. 08a0024p.06 USA v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:27 am
WESTCHESTER COUNTY Criminal Practice Words Uttered by Defendant Not for Legitimate Purpose; Dismissal of Harassment Charges Denied People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
Dotson, 2007 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 3:29 pm
V. [read post]
