Search for: "People v. Downing"
Results 21 - 40
of 17,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
In a decision handed down on October 6, 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court clarified a doctrine known as the "silent witness theory. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
Still, the recent ruling in Williams v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:06 am
v=b_LVCQ-pFFQ [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 2:24 pm
From Hardaway v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:37 am
v=GoIXxFSq7og [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:06 pm
Our journey today takes us into the heart of a gripping legal case: People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:33 pm
I was trying not to keep putting up same sex marriage news here, but I cannot keep my mouth shut over the news that the Supreme Court has ruled DOMA unconstitutional in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 2:06 pm
Thompson (down here in San Diego) a tiny bit more slack -- or at least have toned down the language a tiny, tiny bit.That said, she's definitely and unambiguously right. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
This decision continues the trend of striking down campaign finance laws, a trend made famous in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Peake, et al. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Peck, often said to be the first case in which the Supreme Court struck down a state statute for unconstitutionality. [read post]
28 May 2017, 6:33 am
This past Friday, 26 May 2017, the African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights handed down its first judgement on the rights of indigenous peoples in the matter of African Commission of Human and Peoples’ Rights v The Republic of Kenya (the Ogiek case). [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:19 pm
Words can sometimes mean the exact opposite of what normal people think they might mean. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:49 pm
The Freakonomics guys say we can thank Roe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Samsung v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 11:34 am
The correct answer, according to the defendant here, is:Hire someone to burn down your competitor.It's a story of repeated incompetence. [read post]
