Search for: "People v. Downing"
Results 81 - 100
of 16,752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 5:50 am
In Downes v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 2:09 pm
The dissent (to which only Judge Halligan signed on) offers a rare sociological attack on the criminal justice system.The case is People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:34 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 11:28 am
Pam Karlan: After the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am
Poland The ECtHR handed down judgement in P v Poland (Application no. 56310/15) on 13 February 2025. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:00 am
Although the Canon of 1603 initially secured a victory for ordinary bread over wafer bread in Anglican practice, wafers were reintroduced by the Victorian ritualists.[8] The question was litigated repeatedly, and wafers were famously declared illegal by the Purchas Judgment of 1871 – Elphinstone v Purchas (The Arches Court of Canterbury) [1871] UKPC – because they were not ‘the best and purest wheat bread’. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 6:50 pm
In 2014, four people attending a DJ Datsik concert at Concord Music Hall, located in Chicago’s Logan Square neighborhood, were injured when part of the ceiling came crashing down on their heads. [read post]
Opening Remarks by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at Ukraine Defense Contact Group (As Delivered)
16 Feb 2025, 12:55 pm
") on the one hand, the principle of efficient breach (Lake River Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 12:30 pm
And in a recent case—United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:55 am
Plaintiff loses the appeal.The case is Hoffer v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
EPA than MCI v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:05 am
Under Accardi v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:56 am
The Senate is deliberately slowing down Rep. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 3:39 pm
Scroll down for a video recording of the full event. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 11:47 am
Further, if people and organizations decide to expend significant resources on HR 9495, they must make sure that they have a strong and accurate understanding of the bill. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 6:42 am
From Espinoza v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
In 2011, in Turner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:13 pm
Procureur général du Québec (QCCA)(“CA decision”) and Hak v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 11:06 am
(Wilbanks v. [read post]
