Search for: "People v. Doyle" Results 1 - 20 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2013, 1:44 pm
 Unless you hit someone or something, or some other unusual circumstances apply.Douglas Doyle drives while intoxicated in August 2008. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The law does not require the same degree of proof to hold a defendant for action of the Grand Jury as is demanded for conviction; however, the proof must be sufficient on its face to sustain conviction of the defendant akin to People v Eckert and People v Donahue. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
For the agreement:https://www.eff.org/document/lagleva-v-doyle-settlment-agreement For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/lagleva-v-marin Contact:  press@aclunc.org [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 8:12 am
  The underlying issue is whether "the prosecutor violated his constitutional rights under Doyle v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am by Ben
In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:55 am by Layla Kuhl
” Based on stipulations signed by counsel, the Chief Justice ordered the dismissal of Mercantile Bank of Michigan v Doyle Group Attorneys, PC and Clarke v Richco Construction, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
” As Warby J said in Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – “This is a beguilingly simple sentence. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am by INFORRM
I agree that the evidence in the present case established that the defendant’s posts were not confined to a small pool of people, but had infiltrated, at the least, the wider community in the context of football. [read post]