Search for: "People v. Drew"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,439
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
Trump v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
Round Two: rehearing by the AHRC; an appeal from the AHRC’s 2020 decision (Amir and Siddique v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”)As I have written before, really smart people (including high-level campus leaders) don’t always seem to understand or embrace this crucial distinction between speaking (as is one’s right) and drowning out others who have reserved a place for their own speech. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:49 am
People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
Corbett v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
McIntosh drew from a 1775 negotiation between land speculators and Peeyankihšiaki (Piankashaw people) to subjugate Indigenous sovereignty to the powers of Congress. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
In this regard, it is significant that, in its July 2023 written statement to the Court, Namibia drew attention to “its own historical experience of systematic racial discrimination imposed by South Africa” (para 7 c.) [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:45 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Indeed, the House and Senate would have better records than Hamilton about House and Senate officers who drew compensation from the legislature. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:40 am
"] From Manookian v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
I think that Sotomayor drew a fair implication from the brief, but it was never stated expressly. [read post]
