Search for: "People v. Dukes"
Results 121 - 140
of 711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:10 am
The days of Griggs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:30 am
In Zurcher v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Its importance was further highlighted by the abortive case of New Hampshire v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Huq, a British firm which sells people’s location data, has admitted that some of its information was gained without seeking permission from users. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
Yesterday the University at Buffalo Law School held the panel discussion “Sex, Solicitation, and the Supreme Court: Remembering People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:07 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Bullough details the criticism this incident received in Angola, where more than half the people live in poverty. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
And in the case of famous people, there is a historic and journalistic interest in knowing what they left behind. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
On page 3, the memo refers to the substantial percentage of people who returned to their home country rather than continue in MPP. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Shimm Professor of Law at Duke Law School. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
The ICO blog has a piece about fines imposed on three separate companies a total of £415,000 for sending nuisance marketing to people about car finance, solar panels and funeral plans. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
Both on Lawfare and in a paper last year in the Duke Law Journal, I have described the way the executive branch uses internal constitutional doctrines such as testimonial immunity to thwart congressional oversight. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 held that the damage did not need to be exactly the same – the rule should be flexible in order to do justice. [read post]
1 May 2021, 4:17 pm
United StatesCNN v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
AWQC’s submissions on this point included the following: Unlike Warby J, the Court of Appeal disregarded binding case law which restricts the availability of representative actions for damages (notably Duke of Bedford v Ellis [1901] AC 1 and Markt & Co. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 8:52 am
The lawsuit, Merchant v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:11 pm
Gans summarizes the stakes of Brnovich v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:47 pm
There’s a caricature of US v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:54 am
Prison policies like these violate the Supreme Court precedent set in Turner v. [read post]
