Search for: "People v. Dykes"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 10:35 am
The Texas Supreme Court interpreted yet another confused mineral reservation in a deed in the case of Van Dyke v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:30 am
ColbMany observers have already said wise things about the emesis issuing forth from Samuel Alito (SA) in the leaked draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
They have brazenly desecrated and defiled the national flag and emblem, incited Hong Kong people to oppose China and the Communist Party of China (‘CPC’), besiege Central People's Government (‘CPG’) offices in Hong Kong, and discriminate and ostracize Mainland personnel in Hong Kong. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 6:59 am
Smith argues, at Law and Liberty, that the Supreme Court’s Bostock v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
In Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
(In this respect it’s worth remembering that when Clare Balding complained successfully to IPSO about being called a ‘dyke on a bike’ by A.A. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm
Lange v ABC and Gardiner v Durie do not get a mention. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
American courts have stripped Black lives of value going back to Dred Scott and Plessy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
This new online tool will assist people in BC to finalize divorces. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
Cayetano and Hawai'i v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 12:44 pm
Van Dyke, 643 F. 2d 992, 993-994 (CA4 1981); United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
The post DYKES ON BIKES No Longer Idling After Matal v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am
But they conveniently forget that America, after a less than promising start marred by the likes of Dred Scott v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
Not a coincidence that Dykes w/ Bikes was rejected, or that Heeb was rejected, but Redskins was approved and a 50-page federal opinion defends it. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am
Which is to say it wants to prevent other people from using the mark in expressive ways such as on T-shirts and mugs. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:45 am
As VC readers know (see Eugene’s post here), the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Lee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:57 pm
The band, like Dykes on Bikes®, intentionally chose a name containing a slur to reappropriate the term. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
