Search for: "People v. Edwards" Results 1 - 20 of 1,360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
Prince Edward Island (PEISC (AD)) (aff’d by the Supreme Court of Canada) and the BC Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by Conor Monighan
Lady Arden began with Edwards v Attorney General of Canada. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
The company may have succeeded in creating a lasting new way for transporting people around (unless regulatory and legislative pushback, such as the recently enacted law in California requiring the business to treat drivers as employees rather than contractors, here, becomes widespread), but the long-term effect may be to turn it into a commodity, where familiarity with local market conditions and price competition, not brand strength, are paramount. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am by Carolina Attorneys
Edward Eldred, Attorney at Law, PLLC, by Edward Eldred, for the defendant. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Foreword, written by the Honourable Edward C. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The other participant are Donna Edwards, Mary Anne Franks, David Law, Lawrence Lessig, and Louis Michael Seidman.Josh Blackmon and Randy Barnett have published An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100 Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know, which is especially notable for the accompanying online library of sixty-three videos.The University of Arkansas has issued a release on its law review’s symposium on the bicentennial of M'Culloch v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
As the judge commented, “spying on a journalist would be to investigate the people with whom the journalist is in contact. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
R (on the application of Edward Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) Case Note Introduction In Bridges, an application for judicial review, the UK High Court (Lord Justice Haddon-Cave and Mr. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
One example of this is in J.I.R.L. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, where the Divisional Court reviewed an appeal of a decision by the CICB in relation to the quantum of his claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Given that, a lawyer would be wise to frame sealing requests carefully; consider this from Newman v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:55 am by Adam Smith
The underlying purpose of section 98 is to encourage people to tell the truth in cases concerning children, and the incentive is that any admission will not be admissible in evidence in a criminal trial. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 03158-19 Edwards v The Mail (Cumbria), 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock, No breach- after investigation 02363-19 Kerr v The National, 12 Discrimination (2018), No breach- after investigation 01641-19 Adomaityte v Mail Online, 3 Harassment (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach- after investigation Anonymity Orders Following… [read post]