Search for: "People v. Edwards (1985)"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2009, 4:05 pm
Edwards, 08-1124. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
Take the case of Edward Schad. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
State, 465 So. 2d 1386, 1388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)). [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm
By Rhonda Kay, Partner, Gair Gair Conason Steigman Mackauf Bloom & Rubinowitz; In Edwards v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:15 am
Edwards dissents. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:57 am
The Ohio Supreme Court today unanimously upheld the conviction and death sentence of Edward Lang (State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 5:04 pm
Edwards, 340 So.2d 1167, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Grant v Edwards (1986) Joanne Beswick58. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am
Vol. 121, No. 1985: 282-299. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:25 pm
Defendant's appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order from which the appeal is taken is not adverse or partially adverse within the meaning of CPL 450.90(1) as in People v Edwards. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 5:04 pm
Edwards, 340 So.2d 1167, 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
” Edwards v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:48 am
In 2008, the California Supreme Court decided Edwards v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
Even where sentences are imposed upon separate charges or counts, the provisions of Penal Law 60.01 (2)(d) apply to prohibit the imposition of a sentence of probation as to one charge, where a sentence of imprisonment in excess of the limits set forth therein (60 days for a misdemeanor) have been imposed on another charge (see People v Cerilli, 80 NY2d 1016 [1992][sentencing court’s imposition of probation, along with a term of incarceration on a separate charge in excess of that… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
Merck Frosst Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
The Appellant, Edward Bridges, is a civil liberties campaigner who has been supported by Liberty, the civil liberties membership organisation. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:07 am
Kowalski v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:56 am
People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am
For those who do not have time, the short version is that the court rejected three distinct arguments: that the government violated Edwards by questioning the defendant without counsel present in the aftermath of his capture, that the defendants’ trio of subsequent written waivers of his Miranda and prompt-presentment rights were invalid, and that the government violated the 5th and 6th amendments by preventing defendant’s counsel from locating him after his capture. [read post]
