Search for: "People v. Edwards (1991)" Results 61 - 80 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 9:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
The two voters making the challenge in this case were Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am by admin
S. 153, 169 (citing Rules 701 to 705); see also Edward J. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
"Games might be and [are] the serious business of life to many people. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it the sum of contractual relations among some of the people with stakes in the joint enterprise? [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:44 pm by Ken White
S. 105, 127 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring in judgment)–including obscenity, Roth v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
Trauger of Federal District Court here ruled that the state cannot execute the prisoner, Edward J. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]