Search for: "People v. Emory" Results 1 - 20 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2020, 6:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Oklahoma: Understanding the Implications of the Recent Supreme Court Decision Across Native America In celebration of Indigenous Peoples’ Day, Emory University Professor of English Craig Womack (Creek) chairs a panel discussion titled McGirt V. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:50 pm by Kedar
Brief Amicus Curiae of People for the American Way Foundation in Support of Respondents in Hosanna-Tabor v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am by Sasha Volokh
After 303 Creative, public-accommodation antidiscrimination law is still constitutional—but it's clear that whatever leeway the government may have to force people to serve others in a business context, it can't force them to speak.The post My Emory Law op-ed on 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm by Michael Heise
Torts folks might be interested in a recent paper by Griffin Sims Edwards (Emory, Econ), Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 12:05 pm
New on SSRN: Michael Waterstone, Disability Constitutional Law (Emory L.J., forthcoming). [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:17 am
"   I just read that McDermott, Will & Emory decided that free coffee on every floor was a luxury, so stopped the coffee on one floor, leading some to question the cost savings v. morale bust the decision caused. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bennett Capers's "The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond," which appears in Loving v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  DRE)Emory Law's spring 2018 Faculty Colloquium Series includes legal history papers.A UK-based project on inheritance practices among Indian migrants to Britain includes a fully funded Master's and PhD studentship. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm by Chris Martin
Crespino, an associate professor of history at Emory University, argues that Mississippi did not simply provide "massive resistance" against the civil rights movement, as we often believe. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:19 am by Adam Kolber
This piece, recently posted to SSRN, suggests that the obligations to disclose under the Tarasoff case caused an increase in homicide (presumably by disincentivizing treatment of the most at-risk patients): "Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity"  GRIFFIN SIMS EDWARDS, Emory University, Department of EconomicsThe effect of state duty to warn laws inspired by Tarasoff v Regents has been… [read post]