Search for: "People v. Evans" Results 121 - 140 of 1,166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The post cites the costs to privacy, freedom of speech (such as the ‘legal but harmful’ concept), the ‘duty of care’ demanded of online service providers to limit or even ban both encryption and anonymity, the political control of censorship via Ofcom, and the “mammoth and costly bureaucratic burdens being foisted on people operating online services” as some of the many reasons that the proposed Bill might be doing more harm than good. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
” Washington Post“Lawmakers in Oklahoma on Tuesday approved a near-total ban on abortion, making it the latest Republican-led state to forge ahead with stringent abortion legislation as the Supreme Court weighs a case that could overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
The Evan Law blog has a summary of the recent decision Allen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:06 pm
Edwin Pawloski and U.S.A. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm
dl=0Video: https://youtu.be/hDwl1pkXj90Video Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991 https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
” The latest Edelman Trust survey has revealed that two-thirds (67%) of people globally have said that they believe journalists purposely try to mislead people by saying things that are false or grossly exaggerated. [read post]