Search for: "People v. Farley" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Farley: you interpret the 33% as people not understanding, but maybe they’re reacting to the compound, making them more likely to interpret it as a brand. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 [As Christine Farley pointed out in comments, that was against a different background legal regime. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
At PatentlyO, Christine Farley explains that Monday’s decision in In Iancu v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Privacy protections can help people hide identity of registration. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:49 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Implied Bias Case The Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
"People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
In March, City Health Commissioner Thomas Farley wrote an article in The  Philadelphia Inquirer supporting the tax, saying “the city is meeting its revenue projections. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am by Ron Coleman
 Very few people are prepared to build businesses around disgusting trademarks. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Farley: they do reject all SHIT marks.Rettew: Madonna for wines was once considered scandalous. [read post]